<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Granite Geek - Latest Comments in Different Approaches to Windpower</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://granitegeek.disqus.com/different_approaches_to_windpower/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:40:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Different Approaches to Windpower</title><link>http://granitegeek.org/2008/10/06/different-approaches-to-windpower/#comment-8916304</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice post! thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Oi Torpedo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 00:40:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Different Approaches to Windpower</title><link>http://granitegeek.org/2008/10/06/different-approaches-to-windpower/#comment-2900413</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Boy - that's really a "reprint their press releases " site, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I love this one, about a small $360 device: "... this wind machine can apparently produce enough energy to power up to 60% of domestic energy needs."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A small wind turbine producing 600 kwh a month (60 percent of the NH average of electricity usage)? If only! (Of course, it does say "apparently" and "up to", so the sentence actually doesn't make any claim whatsoever.)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveBrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:03:48 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>