<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Granite Geek - Latest Comments in Cable TV is essential, court rules</title><link>http://granitegeek.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://granitegeek.disqus.com/cable_tv_is_essential_court_rules/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:53:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Cable TV is essential, court rules</title><link>http://granitegeek.org/blog/2009/11/02/cable-tv-is-essential-court-rules/#comment-21854064</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You've already demonstrated your contempt for poor people, and the indignity of the whole process doesn't seem to bother you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Perhaps it is also beyond you to imagine that someone else might be paying for their phone service, perhaps a loved one who wants to keep in touch with their family.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;How nice of you to even suggest that it would be worth clogging the court system further at taxpayer expense, so that a landlord can take pointless revenge against someone who is down on their luck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fran Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:53:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable TV is essential, court rules</title><link>http://granitegeek.org/blog/2009/11/02/cable-tv-is-essential-court-rules/#comment-21853183</link><description>&lt;p&gt;As part of a court hearing, the tenant could be required to provide a bill showing that the cable includes telephone. That would be a complicated extra step, however.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaveBrooks</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:33:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Cable TV is essential, court rules</title><link>http://granitegeek.org/blog/2009/11/02/cable-tv-is-essential-court-rules/#comment-21833585</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"The weird thing is that the ruling doesn’t require a tenant to actually use their cable for telephony"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The weird thing is expecting that the landlord will be able to tell one way or the other whether or not the tenant is using their cable for telephony.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Fran Taylor</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>